Veteran DC Whistleblower Lawyer Says She Reps ‘Good Guy’ in Weinstein Scandal

As Harvey Weinstein ended up being swallowed up in a scandal over accusations of unwanted sexual advances, Washington-based whistleblower lawyer Debra Katz found herself representing a long-time executive who apparently had challenged the prominent Hollywood manufacturer about his supposed misbehavior.

Katz of Washington’s Katz, Marshall & Banks is counsel to Irwin Reiter, a longtime Weinstein Co. executive who, according to a report in The New Yorker today, challenged Weinstein’s supposed harassment of a short-term front-desk assistant called Emily Nestor. Twenty-five at the time, Nestor, a law school graduate, stated what she referred to as “book unwanted sexual advances” that consisted of unsuitable remarks about her look and Weinstein’s supposed takes pride in sexual relations with starlets.

In a quick phone interview and in e-mails Wednesday, Katz, who was initially recognized in The New Yorker short article as representing Reiter, stated scandals such as the Weinstein legend “shine a spotlight on outright unwanted sexual advances, which goes on in business throughout the nation every day.”.

Katz decreased to talk in any information about her work for Reiter, consisting of when she was very first called. She stated she was “pleased” to be recommending Reiter, who supposedly had worked for Weinstein for 30 years.

Messages to Reiter’s company e-mail account and to LinkedIn were not right away returned Wednesday.

” Hopefully, this case will offer a tipping point and will empower females to come forward when they suffer unwanted sexual advances and motivate males to challenge this illegal treatment of their colleagues,” Katz informed The National Law Journal. “This habit is despicable and needs to stop. I’m pleased to play the function I am playing, in this case, recommending a male executive who had the guts to challenge such habits.”.

Reiter, according to The New Yorker’s report, messaged the female assistant to excuse how Weinstein supposedly treated her on her very first day. “We see this very seriously and I personally am very sorry your very first day resembled this,” Reiter composed in a LinkedIn message, the credibility which Katz verified for the publication. “Also, if there are even more undesirable advances, please let us know.”.

In 2016, prior to the governmental election, Reiter, according to The New Yorker, messaged Nestor once again to say, “All these Trump things made me think of you,” and included that he had “battled” Weinstein over his treatment of females 3 weeks before the event including the desk assistant. “I even composed him an e-mail that got me identified by him as sex cops,” Reiter composed, according to the published report. “The battle I had with him about you was legendary. I informed him if you were my child he would not have constructed out so well.”.

‘ A Key Witness in a Major Scandal’.

Inquired about how she came to have a function in the unfolding Weinstein scandal, Katz stated her practice includes representing not just whistleblowers and victims of harassment but also those who defend others who have struggled with declared misbehavior.

” The reality is, my practice is wider than whistleblower law. I’m frequently maintained to represent people who understand discrimination, unwanted sexual advances, scams, waste, and abuse and are witnesses to unlawful practices. Or they themselves might have challenged such practices. These people fairly fear retaliation and need help browsing internal examinations, press questions and so forth. Most people thrust into the type of scenario that Mr. Reiter is now– he’s an essential witness in a significant scandal– maintain counsel,” Katz stated.

” It was sensible for him to keep counsel considered that he was being thrust into this significant scandal,” she included. “In truth, he is the hero here.”.

For twenty years, reports of unwanted sexual advances and attack followed Weinstein as he declared Academy Awards and constructed himself into among the most prominent figures in Hollywood, according to an Oct. 5 investigative report by The New York Times. With that influence came the power to frighten victims into silence– through nondisclosure contracts, risks to take legal action against and, oftentimes, an unmentioned understanding that he might make or break professions, according to the paper.

Weinstein had put together a powerhouse legal group in the accumulation to The New Yorker short article and the New York Times examination.

Through the storm, Weinstein’s longtime lawyer, David Boies, chairman of Boies Schiller Flexner, has kept the manufacturer on as a customer. That relationship might be evaluated if litigation appears in between Weinstein and his previous company, which is also a customer of Boies’ company. On Saturday, the kept in mind complainants lawyer Lisa Bloom, a ladies’ rights supporter who had been recommending Weinstein, stepped down from his legal group.

Blair Berk, a West Hollywood lawyer who has represented entertainment stars, has signed up with the Weinstein group, The Hollywood Reporter stated Wednesday.

Weinstein’s declaration in action to The New Yorker piece specified: “Any accusations of nonconsensual sex are unquestionably rejected by Mr. Weinstein. Mr. Weinstein has even more verified that there were never ever any acts of retaliation versus any females for declining his advances.”.

Weinstein’s name production company fired him Sunday. The company has also employed Debevoise & Plimpton partner John Kiernan for an independent examination into the unwanted sexual advances accusations.

Katz stated Wednesday that her customer wishes to comply with that examination.

” When the public considers whistleblowers, they have the tendency to peg these people as having revealed concerns about scams, waste, abuse, security concerns, financial improprieties, and so on. And, there is a reputable set of laws that safeguard people from retaliation for raising those kinds of concerns,” Katz stated.

She continued: “But the law also secures people who expose or challenge unlawful activity, such as unwanted sexual advances. People who want to stick their necks out and assist others in challenging unwanted sexual advances or other illegal work practices are also entitled to legal security. I represent those people. In representing them, it’s my job to guarantee that they deal with no retaliation for having done the best thing.”.